Letters to the Editor

Letters from November 22, 2000

Nader. Is That With an "e" or an "i"?

Are you happy now?:Matt Smith's article on Ralph Nader ("What's Green and Black and Blue All Over?," Nov. 15) was irresponsible to say the least. The American public has stumbled through election after election with a remarkably hollow interest in politics. "It's soooo boring!" we collectively whine. As a result, very little has changed over the past 20 years. It may just take four years of a Bush administration to spark a little interest in the public eye. Maybe watching their civil rights flushed down the drain will make them realize their error. This is a brutal truth, but a Bush administration might be the best thing that ever happened to the United States if it finally motivates a politically challenged public. I did not, however, vote for Nader in hopes that Bush would win. Like my fellow Nader supporters, I voted against supporting the lesser evil for the millionth goddamned time, and I voted for the future. Al Gore is a centrist with ties to the same corporate interests that Bush carries, and he does not represent the left-wing population in my opinion. Matt, the Democratic Party has completely sold us out, and you're buying every focus-group-generated, corporate-funded minute of it.

Name Withheld
Hayes Valley

Well, are you?:I've got to wonder if Matt Smith relishes the role of a postmodern print Rush Limbaugh, fabricating polemics for sheer entertainment value, or if he really believes his oft-contradictory prose.

Although Smith surely knows the mechanics of the Electoral College, he failed to point out that not one Californian who voted Green for Nader affected this election in Bush's favor one whit.

Greens transcend the traps of leftism, and move forward to craft a new way that is neither liberal nor conservative but promotes the Green values over dysfunctional party lines, environmental wisdom over short-term profit, grass-roots democracy over top-down authoritarianism, and that notion we must do better than the lesser of two evils.

And given our recent local experience between Frank Jordan and Willie Brown, I can say that I pity the fool who prefers a smart liberal shark to a merely incompetent conservative placeholder.

Marc Salomon
North Mission

Bastard Angel

Poet's corner:I want to express my gratitude for your groundbreaking feature story by staff writer Mark Athitakis ("The Return of the Bastard Angel," Nov. 8). It's by far the most significant news article on my life and work in many years. I feel rescued from the deafening silence in the media.

Unfortunately, my friend of 26 years, Gregory Moloney, was not mentioned in the article, although I spoke of him several times as essential for the interview. After my coronary bypass four years ago, I was helpless for six months. His assistance then and now has been indispensable.

Your subhead causes erroneous reactions in some readers. I've already had an e-mail from an unknown admirer warning that I'll regret my relationship with ACT UP. But I have no relationship with ACT UP. Two members happen to be friends. As for their behavior and beliefs, they're not necessarily mine, and I don't tell them what to do.

Finally, the subhead is misleading. I can't for the life of me imagine how [ACT UP] can resurrect my reputation. Only a major critic, publisher, or publicist could do that. I have the credentials. In short, I don't count on ACT UP for anything. I do count on my two friends for their much-needed assistance and their brilliance, both of which are life-giving. Again, I'm very grateful to SF Weeklyfor this wonderful article.

Harold Norse
Mission District

Which is no doubt why you're so popular:Harold Norse doesn't need ACT UP S.F. to "resurrect his reputation." Harold's reputation ranks him as one of the great gay poets of all time. However, I must point out, ACT UP S.F.'s message of universal health care, an end to corporate control of medicine, and a need to meet the basic necessities for the vast majority of people (i.e., housing, drug rehabilitation, and education for minorities) in order to end AIDS is a message that can only be despised by AIDS-industry CEOs, landlords, corporate pharmaceutical bosses, biotech researchers, and Pentagon officials. For the rest of us such a message is good news!

Ronnie Burk
Hayes Valley

They can't be all bad. They enjoy poetry:I feel extremely sorry for anyone counting on Todd Swindell or ACT UP S.F. As a gay man with AIDS, I'm very familiar with Todd & Co. (via the medical marijuana movement). These ACT UP S.F.ers do play by the rules -- the rules of any politician: Step on others, stab them in the back, and do anything you like to get where you want. How fortunate for them that they have been so willing and able to manipulate sick people. They're exploiting a community that according to them doesn't exist. If HIV doesn't cause AIDS, then why have I been hospitalized with serious infections?

Run, Harold Norse, run!

James Starr
San Francisco

Dot-Com Autumn

We double-checked. He's serious: Matt Smith -- he can't be serious, can he ("Not Com," Nov. 8)?

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help
San Francisco Concert Tickets
©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.