Most Popular
Recent Blog Posts
National Features >
Letters to the EditorWeek of February 6, 2002Published on February 06, 2002Female Football Would an equally disorganized football team be described as "charming" if the players were male? Why did the editors feel the need to use "charming" when the adjective had nothing to do with the story? Is it really necessary to slap on such a condescending label just because the people being talked about happen to have vaginas? A pep talk from the coach: Thank you for the honest and true story about our team. Mark Dorton Shooing Horses We [the remaining boarders] are not staking our claim or being selfish. We for the most part have boarded horses at the park for 25 years or more. I have been a boarder for 31 years. We are not looking for exclusive rights to the barn. If the barn closes, it will never reopen. The barn was successfully run for over 51 years, prior to the management from hell. We want to see the barn returned to the public. There should be affordable programs, at-risk-youth programs, after-school programs, PE classes in horseback riding, handicapped riding programs. The present operators catered to the wealthy, mostly white population. As for the statement about our not looking for another facility, that is totally untrue. We have all been looking for other facilities that could accommodate our horses. My horse JoJo has several physical problems that need to be monitored closely. I have not been able to find a facility that could accommodate his needs. If I could not see JoJo on a regular basis, he would lose his will to live. There is no way I could see him daily if I had to move him to Marin or Woodside. The most humane thing to do would be to euthanize him. If you are going to print a story, get the facts -- all the facts. Kathy Mroz Sermon on their mounts: I found your article disingenuous and misleading. It is untrue that the stables are a "subsidized" gift to a privileged few. The stables were built by the WPA as part of a program that constructed many public amenities as an economic stimulus package during the Great Depression. No operator of the stables could have afforded to build them, and it is not possible for any operator to afford the half-million dollars to repair them. [That] would require an increase in rents, which would truly put the keeping of a horse out of range of all but the most affluent. The stables are a Rec and Park facility, just as are the fly-casting pools, the Anglers Lodge, the boathouse, and the Polo Fields. They are rented to clubs, event sponsors, and operators for revenue. To demand that an operator invest half a million dollars in restoring the facility while demanding that rents and fees be kept low is riding one's horse in two directions -- it just cannot be done. The result will be the permanent closure of the stables and their eventual demolition as "structural hazards." Another loss of quality of life for the residents of San Francisco! The Only Way Out Bonnie Wilks Shoring Up Aquatic Park
write your comment
|