By Joseph Geha
By Jonathan Kiefer
By Katie Tandy
By Mollie McWilliams
By Jennifer Baires
By Jonathan Curiel
By Sherilyn Connelly
You may have heard of Pablo Picasso. He was a painter and sculptor, I understand, and the co-founder of cubism. He was also, many people don't realize, a prolific book illustrator. He contributed drawings and etchings (Wikipedia says 34,000 of them) to more than 150 titles over a period of almost 60 years; the Legion of Honor, which is displaying 19 of those volumes, calls him "the greatest book illustrator of the 20th century." Having seen the show, I'm inclined to agree with that assessment.
When Picasso was illustrating books from about 1914 until his death in 1973 publishers came to him with ideas and manuscripts. He knew many of the most important novelists and poets of his time, and he often teamed up with them to create fantastical finished pieces. He also worked from older, previously published texts; as curator Robert Flynn Johnson's introduction to the Legion of Honor show has it, Picasso's "competitive instincts" were "to make his art comparable to these classical texts."
Yet even he labored under a sort of secondary artistic status. "Although a man of legendary ego," Johnson writes, "Picasso, like all illustrators, had to subvert his inclination to work unilaterally to allow the collaboration with author, publisher, and text that is crucial to the success of an illustrated book." In other words, no matter how imaginative an artist you are, when you're illustrating a book, the words come first.
When an artist illustrates a book for adults which doesn't happen often these days, because such books are expensive to produce and somewhat hard to sell he doesn't just do the cover; he also creates images that will appear throughout the volume, interspersed with the story. He has to find his way into the narrative without becoming overwhelmed. When the results succeed, as Picasso's books do (and as lots of stuff from McSweeney's does), it's a blast. But it's not an easy relationship.
By way of understanding how it must feel to a talented and creative person to play second fiddle (of a sort), I spoke to two San Francisco illustrators, Mark Ulriksen and Ward Schumaker. Both of them produce work I'm sure you'd recognize: In addition to a few books and a handful of book covers, the 49-year-old Ulriksen has done numerous covers for The New Yorker (including the recent Dick Cheney/Brokeback Mountain visual pun); Schumaker, 63, has 17 commercial books and two limited-edition titles under his belt, not to mention work published in more than 100 magazines and various logos (think Moose's). Neither of them complains about being subservient to the theme or story; they both love what they do and feel lucky to do it. But it's not an easy time to be a book illustrator certainly not as easy, say, as it was for Picasso. And he worked his ass off.
"Illustration has a bad name," says Ulriksen (who illustrated the classic story of Willie Mays' great 1954 catch, A Day in the Bleachersby Arnold Hano, in a new edition coming out soon). Some try to argue that illustration isn't fine art, he says, but Ulriksen points out that even the Renaissance masters were working for patrons who wanted them to create paintings that illustrated a point. Today the job of book illustrator is even harder: People are "more visually literate and maybe more illiterate," Ulriksen says, and now we have so many more pictures to absorb that we have to "edit out the junk."
Ulriksen usually works from finished manuscripts or synopses. "There's very little collaboration with the writer," he explains. He gets some input, but not too much. And that's as it should be, he thinks: "Most creative people just want to please themselves."
When Picasso illustrated books, by contrast, he often worked directly with writers to create etchings and prints that might enhance and expand the text. In La Barre d'appui (The Handrail), for example, he added to Paul Eluard's 1936 collection of poems an image of his own right hand, made by dipping it in ink and applying it directly to the copper plate. For Le Chant des Morts (The Song of the Dead) by Pierre Reverdy what the Legion of Honor's description calls "one of the most radical works of [Picasso's] entire oeuvre of book illustration" the artist added bold red strokes between and around Reverdy's handwritten lines of poetry. The thick, abstract patterns "functioned as an illuminated manuscript," but were "closer in emotional force to the power of calligraphy." In other words, Picasso's graphic illustrations made the words into a kind of prayer.
Schumaker saw Le Chant des Morts in an earlier show at the Legion of Honor, and it had a huge effect on him. "I just got blown away by that," he says, and started using hand-lettering in some of his own pieces. He, too, works with finished manuscripts most often, rather than collaborating with a writer. Like Ulriksen, he understands that illustrating to a text is something of a compromise, and he has no problem with that. "It's service. I'm from the Midwest we believe a lot in that," he says with a chuckle. Given that the things he'd really like to do (such as hand-painted books) don't have much of an audience, he's grateful for the work.
Find everything you're looking for in your city
Find the best happy hour deals in your city
Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%
Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city