Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Most Popular

National Features >

  • Village Voice

    The Great Walls of Chinatown

    With the exception of the electric rice cookers, this Bowery tenement could have come straight from the Nineteenth Century.

    By Elizabeth Dwoskin

  • Houston Press

    Getting Off

    DUI attorney Tyler Flood wins 80 percent of his trials--even if his clients were 100 percent drunk.

    By Mike Giglio

  • Miami New Times

    Park or Die Tryin'

    From the homeless parking mafia to the meter fairy, finding a spot in Miami has taken a turn toward the surreal.

    By Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    The Baddest Men on the Planet

    Straight from the Sam's Club tire shop, Brett Rogers prepares to meet Fedor Emelianenko in mortal combat.

    By Bradley Campbell

Dark Payola Emerges

“Direct licensing” is the new threat to Webcasting´s meritocracy of music

Share

  • rss

By David Downs

Published on June 26, 2007 at 4:39pm

Economics over artistic merit is a recipe for payola — which is where labels pay radio stations to spin their music. It's illegal. But a new form of payola has been detected. It is the exact opposite of payola, but with all the same effects — forcing radio audiences to listen to the garbage labels want them to hear. It's dark payola.

The increased royalties set by the Copyright Royalty Board on March 2 came with a distinct catch. Webcasters are free to ink direct licensing deals with labels for a lower rate than the one set by the board. Direct licensing allows major labels to apply economic pressure to Webcasters who were formerly concerned with playing the best music.

If Net radio stations don't win their fight, playing whatever they want will become prohibitively expensive. Playing crap, however, won't be. Under the new rules it would be economically logical for cash-strapped Webcasters to take discounted rates to play music the labels want them to play. Instead of the labels paying the Webcasters, the Webcasters pay the labels less. Dark payola.

Evidence of this practice has already appeared with the launch of Slacker.com. The Internet radio startup has stated in the press that it made direct license deals with the majors that have saved it the hassle of paying higher royalties.

John Simson, executive director of the royalty collection agency SoundExchange, says dark payola won't be a problem, because radio stations can ink cheap deals with indie labels as well. But SomaFM Webcaster Rusty Hodge says that's unlikely, given the manpower it takes to handle licensing from thousands of indie music labels.

Hodge's business partner Elise Nordling works for a company practicing a form of dark payola on the indie side of things, though. Her daytime employer, the Independent Online Distribution Agency, offers free promotional MP3s from indie bands in its network. Pimping IODA MP3s on sites like SF Weekly's music blog has become easier than trying to get permissions from whatever band such sites choose. IODA's a good service, but it illustrates the point.

Furthermore, dark payola threatens terrestrial radio as well. On June 13, the Recording Industry Association of America launched a new push to raise royalty rates on terrestrial radio stations through the nascent MusicFirst Coalition. Coalition chief Mark Kadesh — former chief of staff for Sen. Dianne Feinstein — said he's not sure of the coalition's stance on direct licensing. However, coalition member Simson said direct licensing will occur.

Think you love terrestrial radio now? Wait till Britney Spears really is the cheapest thing to play.