Most Popular

Recent Articles

Recent Articles by Mary Spicuzza

National Features >

  • Houston Press

    The Passion of Victoria Osteen

    A flight attendant's smackdown with the wife of mega-preacher Joel Osteen inspires a whole new set of commandments.

    By Rich Connelly

  • City Pages

    Your Field Guide to the RNC

    Today Denver, tomorrow the Twin Cities.

    By Matt Snyders and Bradley Campbell

  • The Pitch

    Star Power

    A country musician rescues Waylon Jennings' tour bus from the scrap heap.

    By C.J. Janovy

  • Village Voice

    Serrano's Second Movement

    The provocateur who brought you "Piss Christ" pinches off a new concept.

    By Lynn Yaeger

Chinatown Power Players Behind Ed Jew Smokescreen, Source Says

Continued from page 1

Published on September 26, 2007

But the Peskin recall crew hasn't given up. It filed another notice of intention later in the summer and has been again circulating recall petitions. Still, a Department of Elections staff member says the soonest the issue could be on the ballot is in February 2008 — less than a year before Peskin is termed out of office, in January 2009. In order to be considered for the February ballot, the recall committee would have had to submit its paperwork by Monday, which did not happen, according to elections staff members. To qualify the recall for the ballot, the group must collect signatures from about 3,300 people, or 10 percent of the district's 32,895 registered voters.

Peskin called the recall effort a "character defamation campaign." He says his opponents first attempted to make an issue of his home purchase in 2004 when he was running for re-election to the Board of Supervisors. Peskin says he's known since the beginning of the recall effort that Lee and Yee are "behind it for reasons of personal self-interest," but adds that he was interested to hear allegations that Ed Jew was involved in it too.

It's not about Ed Jew, according to recall committee member Raymond "Shrimp Boy" Chow (a longtime Chinatown gang leader who was profiled in the SF Weekly article "Enter the Dragon Head," Aug. 1, 2007). Chow says the focus of the recall is on standing up against Peskin, not earning a salary. "I don't get money to do it," Chow says. "I just do what I feel is right." Chow now suspects Reginald was more worried about making money than with the recall effort.

Reginald insists that this is now about "principle" rather than money and filed the lawsuit against Pius Lee alleging breach of contract in small claims court. He's asking for $7,500 — the maximum amount allowed in small claims. That case is one of 11 that Reginald has filed in small claims court since May 2006, a review of court records show.

Reginald had also filed a separate lawsuit against Supervisor Ed Jew, claiming he was also behind the Peskin recall campaign, but says he has since "decided against it" because Jew already has enough legal problems.

« Previous Page   1   2

SF Weekly Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff
Backpage.com