SuperHustle

I am outranged at the airports proposition. Maintaing competitive service and pricing is essential to our tourism and convention business in San Francisco. We will really be loosing out if we take away the smaller and more personalized airport transportation options for SFO.

I think it's absolutely outrageous what's happening to these small businesses. San Francisco has always prided itself on being an advocate and voice for the minorities, and this country was founded on free trade! Of all the cities in the country, I would think that San Francisco would be the last one to support the corporation at the expense of the hard-working small business who provide a viable alternative to airport patrons like me.

Shame on you San Francisco,Norma Sayage

What? Are you kidding? That is so ridiculous. I've been using a smaller airport shuttle for the last at least 5-6 years and SFO wants to restrict me for only one/two big corporations as a rightful choice? No way--where are the Sups? Newsom?
Secondly, why in a world San Francisco would give all the biz to a French-own company? There must be something cooking behind the scenes--I just hope that those little guys find the money to hire a big shot attorney who can sue their a-s-s-e-s.
I want to have a choice, as I've had it for years.

I thought the USA was made up of small businesses. it seems to me when you take the competition out of the equation you get monoply's. If we keep going this way anyone of these big companies will be able to charge any price they want. What'S wrong with AMERICAN COMPANIES???????????? I WONDER WHO IS GETTING PAID OFF AT THE AIRPORT COMMISSION?????

Come on....This is crazy for sure!!! Those where the days when large companies were not allowed to operate in the San Francisco because we were to support our Mom and Pap type of business...it is not enough what is going on with the economy, San Francisco will contribute even more in putting more people out of work and leave more hungry families...Too bad they can't figure out a way to outsource this type of business, however they will allow a foreign business to take over and exclude the locals....
Too bad we are loosing our Values as Bay Area Patrons...
Good Luck Quake City Shuttle!!!

WOW. Some big shots in the game. There must be some money to be had behind the scenes. What I am missing is the main reason to do that--why brake what seems to be working for so many years? Also, what comes as a big surprise is that SuperShitle is owned by French. American business is being sold to foreign corps under the table...nice.
Good luck to you little guys--I truly hope you win it somehow.
Kisses, Carly

WOW, this is pretty appalling. Just when you think things can't get anymore screwed up and backwards in this country, you read something like this. Unbelievable! I truly hope that someone at SFO comes to their senses and reconsiders their plan to screw the little American guy in favor of the international conglomerate.

This proposition is a prime example of 2 words "UNLAWFUL" & "ACT OF MONOPOLY". I forsee this proposition being easily reversed if taken to court. On my behalf, this should not pass as it clearly represents a monopoly act and an unequal business oportunity for the minority group. This should be an easy victory case for a lawyer representing this case as it truly violates the Sherman Anti-Monopoly act without a doubt !

I was outraged by the threats to local shuttle companies operating at SFO. Why would we allow all competition to be eliminated by a French owned company that is simply making a grab for a monopoly at the airport?

When is enough…enough. Super Shuttle is already serving 22 airports nationwide and now they want a monopoly on the transportation in and out of SFO. The decision makers are obviously getting greased, but at the expense of 300 honest working individuals who will consequently lose their homes, their family, and quite possibly their lives. It is a shame that our society perpetually marginalizes the “little guy.” Disgusting!

This is exactly how we hurt ourselves as consumers and end up paying for it in the long run. By allowing corporations to push the smaller business entities out of operation and monopolize the market on a particular industry we relinquish all control as individuals to make up our own mind about the services we choose. A great example is Blockbuster wiping out all the “mom & pop” video stores, with our help, and then charging astronomical fees to consumers who were forced to return and pay since we relinquished all our other options. This seems like a surefire way to remove choice and ensure smaller companies from ever being able to operate which means less personal service and more “it’s our company policy….”