Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

  • Dallas Observer

    The Fight for Texas

    Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison are locked in a battle over the soul of the GOP. They're also running for governor.

    By Sam Merten

So Scary

Share

  • rss

By Hiya Swanhuyser

Published on January 21, 2009

Dr. Lisa Bero is on our side. The UCSF pharmacologist studies studies. Studies turn into pills, and we take pills. So it stands to reason that anyone who takes pills might want to know what kind of logic rules those studies. We've heard, for example, that plenty of clinical trials ignore the possibility of health, meaning that no matter what reaction a test subject shows, it's defined as pathological. There is no health?! What the heck kind of implications does that have for the "little purple pill" or whatever? (And why are pharmaceutical companies trying to sell stuff directly to us?) Dr. Bero knows and will tell.
Wed., Feb. 4, 6 p.m., 2009