Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Most Popular

National Features >

  • Village Voice

    The Great Walls of Chinatown

    With the exception of the electric rice cookers, this Bowery tenement could have come straight from the Nineteenth Century.

    By Elizabeth Dwoskin

  • Houston Press

    Getting Off

    DUI attorney Tyler Flood wins 80 percent of his trials--even if his clients were 100 percent drunk.

    By Mike Giglio

  • Miami New Times

    Park or Die Tryin'

    From the homeless parking mafia to the meter fairy, finding a spot in Miami has taken a turn toward the surreal.

    By Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    The Baddest Men on the Planet

    Straight from the Sam's Club tire shop, Brett Rogers prepares to meet Fedor Emelianenko in mortal combat.

    By Bradley Campbell

Craigslist executive accuses newspapers of hurting his site's bottom line

Share

  • rss

By Anna McCarthy

Published on June 16, 2009 at 11:48am

Newspapers have spent the past decade whining over Craigslist pulling the classifieds rug out from under their industry's once-Prada–clad feet. But after law enforcement recently pressured Craigslist to be more vigilant in keeping prostitutes from advertising on the site, CEO Jim Buckmaster turned the tables: He began accusing alt-weekly newspapers of unfairly benefiting from Craiglist's misfortunes.

Buckmaster's crusade hit home when SF Weekly followed up on a tip from a reader who claimed that Craigslist's Therapeutic Services category had been suddenly overrun by hooker ads after the site nixed its Erotic Services category. Buckmaster responded to SF Weekly's preliminary inquiries into the matter with a resounding WTF?

After claiming that the number of suspicious massage and spa ads in the Therapeutic Services category had actually decreased in recent weeks, he launched into what has become his trademark diatribe: "You're missing the real story here, which is that persons looking to post ads that do not meet craigslist's stringent standards have been driven to other services entirely," he wrote in an e-mail. "Are you aware that the volume of ads in the SF Weekly's 'adult entertainment' classifieds section is up more than 400% in the 4 weeks since craigslist closed its 'erotic services' section?"

No, Mr. Buckmaster, SF Weekly's reporters were not aware. Probably because SF Weekly's reporters don't have a clue what goes on in the ad department — we know only that they get paid more than we do. But since you brought it up, Backpage.com, an online classifieds site owned by SF Weekly's parent company, has indeed seen a spike in traffic since Craigslist cut its Erotic Services section. The volume of adult ads in the physical paper (for the few who haven't noticed) hasn't changed much, our sales reps say. (However, Washington City Paper, an alt-weekly in the nation's capital, reports a 38 percent increase in adult ads over the same time last year. Woo hoo!)

As much as we like to gloat, we'll concede Buckmaster has a point: Maybe Craigslist was unfairly targeted over sites like Backpage.com because of its limelight status after the Craigslist Killer. And maybe weeklies and Craigslist should find a way to peacefully coexist, because we all want the same thing: a free society where horny but harmless johns can pay for blow jobs from our advertisers.