tempestuous(ness) or, HIStory Is Told by the Victors

Chris,

The audience was laughing from the start of the performance you attended. I'm sorry you didn't find my material funny or compelling, but you do not accurately reflect the mood in the theatre that Sunday afternoon. One of your fellow critics saw the same show that afternoon and had an entirely different experience. I suppose that's how it should be. If I get wildly diametrical views of the play, then I've created something to both please and piss off everyone equally.

I wrote this play to work on many different levels. If you know nothing about The Tempest or Shakespeare, there are things for you. If you know some, there is more. In your case, I would love to discuss your background in Shakespearean criticism and the history of his works, this time period and specifically, The Tempest. We disagree on many of the "factual" elements of your review. I have my sources. I would love to know yours. I spent a great deal of time researching all the elements of what I wrote. My research does not agree with what you represent in your review. I would love to delve into the specifics.

I do appreciate though that you focused your spleen on my play rather than the wonderfully talented cast and crew. If you didn't enjoy yourself, ultimately, that is my fault, not theirs.

I am glad you mentioned Timon of Athens, which is a brilliant first half of a play, saddled with a enigmatic conclusion. It reminds me of another play I've seen recently. I hope to discuss with you sometime soon.