-
03/31/2012 4:42:00 AM
For an experienced personal injury attorney, Denver residents should contact Scott O'Sullivan for a free initial consultation. He handles his cases on a contingency fee basis, which means that he is compensated by clients only when he obtains compensation for them, which provides him with even greater incentive to represent his clients well. His fee is then based on a percentage of the award.
-
03/26/2012 8:43:00 PM
Awesome. Mr. Freshman, give these pigs what they deserve. Not many get the great chance that you do.
-
01/22/2012 8:19:00 PM
Those idiots screwed up raiding Mr. Freshman's residents. The Law PROFESSOR, not student, will assure the case is well litigated.
I can see those arrogant bureaucratic goons, with no common sense, laughing with Mr. Freshman in handcuffs, as he tries to put information into their stupid heads. Disgusting.
-
11/02/2011 7:26:00 PM
I wonder whatever happened to this case.
-
07/22/2011 5:49:00 PM
No one is going to help you, nazi scum. You're on your own. Enjoy being raped in prison by a bunch of AIDS infested black guys.
-
07/22/2011 5:48:00 PM
Hell yeah Mr. Freshman. I love that final line, "I see [the agents'] houses sold at auction and their kids' college tuitions taken away from them. There will not be a better litigated case this century."
-
07/05/2011 2:02:00 PM
Check out the FAQ's on http://flexyourrights.org/
They can lie to you, don't have to "read you your rights", and can continue to ask you questions even after you have requested an attorney. What's more, now that the powers of the Patriot Act and various other HLS related scams have been expanded (re: Yobama's efforts to indemnify Bush's boy Ashcroft for violating innocent people's civil liberties), there is an unlimited palette of abuses available to the L.E. community.
Warrant-less wiretaps, warrant-less searches, and warrants being issued with nothing more than the say so of a fellow agent without any review by any judge at all. Add to this the precedent set in Yobama's Ashcroft debacle and you have the establishment of the ultimate police state. The government has, in plain view of the ignorant asses that elected them, created an environ where they can and do whatever the hell they want with the force of law, guns, property forfeiture and imprisonment at their whimsical disposal. Congratulations America, you are reaping just what the state run educational system has taught you to sow. How's that "Hope and Change" feelin' now?
As for entrapment, better read up on just what that means. Much like the label "Fascist" too many people throw it out there without having a clue to its real meaning. Were you charged with something that you could have or would have reasonably been able and willing to commit were you not involved with the police? A cop smoking weed with you, selling you drugs or buying them from you entrapment does not make. Not having the sense to shut the fuck up and not incriminating yourself has nothing at all to do with entrapment, just effective interrogation technique. The police have no responsibility whatsoever to educate you about your rights, they exist purely to enforce.
If you consent to a search, game over. If you let them into your home without a warrant, you just provided them with consent - or at least a great way for them to cook up enough probable cause to support an expansion of the visual search that they can do from your door way.
They can stop you and pat you down if they see something or feel that there is a real threat of a weapon on your person endangering them. They can ask you to empty your pockets., but it's totally up to you to refuse. If you comply...you've just given your consent to the search. You can refuse and they can and do ignore you, but your chances are always much better if you at least attempt to assert your rights before anything gets started - whether you are guilty or completely innocent. There is absolutely never anything to be gained by giving consent to any search or speaking unnecessarily to a law enforcement officer. How else do you think innocent people end up in jail?
Lastly...there has never been a time when even the smartest and most eloquent con man has been able to talk his way out of a charge, so just shut the fuck up and stay free.
The inversion is complete. You are smart to fear a government such as ours, even though they are the ones who should fear us. 'Tis definitely past time to turn the tables. Video tape everything. Get witnesses and learn how to exercise what rights you have left, and for what it's worth - stop falling for the bullshit and electing more of the same old shit. The only practical difference to our freedoms between Yobo and bumblin' born again Bush is the color of their skin. Democans and Republicats be damned!
-
06/28/2011 8:38:00 PM
the fbi came to my house over a bank robbery that I had no part of,while they where in my house looking for the bank money they found a 9mm gun and some pot plants and they charged me for the gun and plants should i fight and try to get it dropped there is also somthing called fruit of the poisonas tree if anybody could look at it to ive read a lot about it but i still kinda dont get it i would really like some comments thanks
-
Arnoldarnold5656 06/28/2011 8:03:00 PM
the fbi came to my house over a bank robbery that i had no part of while they where in my house looking for the money from the bank they found a 9mm ruger and some pot plants and they charged me for plants and the gun
-
Lawchick 05/25/2011 6:06:00 PM
Anything that is found in your vehicle, you are assumed to have knowledge of it, and further, you assumed to be the default owner of the item. Yes we are in America, and there is always a way around our rights, so be cautious and know your rights when it comes to search of your vehicle.
-
Ifnotforlove 05/22/2011 12:22:00 AM
Same when we tried to sue Mendo sherrifs, 2 more raids after we filed our lawsuit
-
SILLYSTEPHENIE 03/21/2011 5:21:00 PM
OH MY GOSH! CAN THEY REALLY GET AWAY WITH THAT? AGAIN, WE ARE IN THE UNITED STATES WHERE PEOPLE ARE SUPPOSE TO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Sillystephenie 03/21/2011 5:18:00 PM
I myself had an officer entrap me then without cause search my vehicle and when mistakenly found another persons purse with a paraphanlia contraption they cuffed ME and they didn't read me my rights! I'm afraid of the government now. We are still in America, Right?
-
Coho 03/16/2011 1:57:00 AM
FUCK and i mean FUCKKKKKKKKKKKKK the dea for the war on marijuana
FUCK THOSE guys hardcore, sue um broke
-
Hazza 03/13/2011 6:01:00 PM
No one screws with Cal Lightman and gets away with it.
-
Dwes 03/10/2011 9:21:00 PM
He is "militant" because of the arrogance and ignorance of the officers in question. Obviously, anyone can be incorrectly searched or detained, and people do make mistakes. But there is no need to be handcuffed unnecessarily (he was not yet under arrest) nor any reason for (supposedly) trained officers to laugh at him. There is no reason people need to acquiesce to humiliation just because it is being done by the police.
I bet that if the police had behaved professionally and apologized for their mistake, he would not be interested in seeing them pay so dearly or personally.
-
03/10/2011 2:24:00 AM
Go for it. How dare they screw up like that and for what? Pot. Legalize it and lay off cops.
-
Mel5018 03/09/2011 4:39:00 AM
hahah move to Maine no cops no problems...
-
Louisville Lawyer 03/06/2011 9:32:00 PM
Cops is cops.
-
Happyadvocate 03/03/2011 10:30:00 PM
"NOT live in police state.... We've all been harassed by cops, but that is the nature of our society. "
HUH?
-
Edithgarnvosky 03/01/2011 5:43:00 PM
Despite the obvious anti-police bias on this site, we do NOT live in police state. Mistakes are made, of course, and police search warrant mistakes can happen as well. Why is Freshman so militant ("take the college funds from the officers" because he was inconvenienced for an hour or two)? Pathetic. We've all been harassed by cops, but that is the nature of our society. Embarassing for him that " Wow, a law professor!" thinks he shouldn't be subject to the same things the rest of society are.
-
03/01/2011 8:53:00 AM
I have a feeling that this will NOT be occuring in this case. Freshman has powerful friends too.
-
02/28/2011 7:18:00 PM
Unfortunately, as the officers were on the job at the time this happened, the money will likely still come out of the taxpayers' pockets unless the government goes after the officers for indemnification. That is unlikely, though.
Hopefully the officers will face some sort of disciplinary action.
-
02/27/2011 8:24:00 PM
Sic 'em Gary.
-
02/27/2011 6:55:00 PM
Freshman had better get ready for heavy harassment.
I've tried filing complaints against the SFPD before. They are not above:
death threats against you, your roommates and family,
having their junkie informants smash your car windshield,
throwing used motor oil on your house,
"detaining" you and your friends on a Friday, (so you have to stay in jail all weekend),
planting crack in the squad car in an attempt to scare you,
filing false charges against you with the DA.,
having brother officers stop and run the plate of EVERY SINGLE CAR that visits your house,
writing bogus parking tickets (called "flyers") and tearing up your copy so they can arrest you and beat the shit out of you, then claim you assaulted THEM,
filing false complaints about you, your house, your friends, your work and anyone you do business with at any city agency that will harass you for them,
going through your garbage to look for information to use against you,
photographing you and your friends to intimidate you,
hammering on your door at one a.m. to have cops order you to move your trash can ONE FOOT,
trespassing,
hate speech,
peering in your girlfriend's bedroom window,
accusing you of vandalism,
telling anyone who will listen that you are a junkie, "faggot," "camel fucker" etc.
refusing to take reports of crimes against you,
refusing to follow up on complaints,
harassing calls,
and that's just the stuff I could PROVE.
-
02/27/2011 5:42:00 PM
I am still naive enough to hope that the lawsuit might get the SFPD to respect our rights. I still hope he wins and gets the officers fired and broke
-
02/27/2011 8:10:00 AM
problem is that litigation has little to do with the legal precedent that is taught in law school. This law professor had better hire a REAL lawyer....
-
Me 02/27/2011 4:42:00 AM
I meant to say "they're." Pardon me.
-
Me 02/27/2011 4:41:00 AM
Don't these police officers have anything better to do with their time? What's wrong with them anyway (police)? They're not like other people. There's something very different about them including that often, their overbearing bullies.
-
Alastaire Crowley 02/26/2011 5:03:00 PM
Pat ~ breathe thru your nose man.
-
Alastaire Crowley 02/26/2011 5:00:00 PM
Right on professor. ignore comments like pat as he has no idea about all the laws that allow him to be such an idiot moron. Sue them into non-existance. If I ever win big bucks in the lottery I plan to sue the state of florida into bankruptcy. Up the revolution
-
02/26/2011 5:00:00 PM
Sadly, whatever damages the Perfessor collects, the money will come out of taxpayers' pockets.
Which reminds me...aren't we the employers? I would like to see doofus jerk cops like these fired, and required to compensate taxpayers for the cops incompetence.
Actually, I am sick of reading about government workers who fail to do their jobs. Child Protective Services, for example. Bad cops. Bad politicians who make stupid, expensive choices.
FIRE THEM ALL! I'm sure there are plenty of good, qualified people out there who would do their job conscientiously and well. Just gotta get the slugs cleared out that are just taking up room and costing us money.
-
pat 02/26/2011 3:26:00 PM
another douchebag law professor. Surely professor, you should know you have only nominal damages. Hows a dollar sound?
-
123 02/26/2011 2:52:00 PM
Right or power?
-
02/26/2011 11:32:00 AM
This story -- and lawsuit -- will help get the feds out of the prohibition business. If we could do that, and tell Beltway politicians to quit seducing local officials with funds to "fight drugs", sanity would begin to return.
-
Chris Ford 02/26/2011 6:54:00 AM
Professor Freshman,
Good luck with the lawsuit. May you win a *SUBSTANTIAL* amount of damages from the policemen in question.
-
Doitch142 02/25/2011 11:31:00 PM
once in a while this war on drugs comes down on the wrong dude. get em freshman
-
02/25/2011 10:36:00 PM
Good luck, brother. They have the right to do anything to you that you can't stop them from doing. Hopefully we can find a peaceful way of rescinding that dastardly right!
-
02/25/2011 4:12:00 PM
That's been going on since the DA's stance shift in November. They had a buyback program that I highly doubt was successful.
-
02/25/2011 4:11:00 PM
I just wanna say... OWNED
-
02/24/2011 9:58:00 PM
They're still busting people for pot? Don't they have real police jobs?
-
Me 02/24/2011 4:51:00 PM
I hope the law professor sue these fucks bankrupt so the DEA pigs have to close down the bacon factory
-
Dkroller2112 02/23/2011 10:39:00 PM
Go get em!!! Sue their f*cking pants off.
-
123 02/23/2011 4:34:00 AM
pussy
-
Mark Hess 02/23/2011 4:08:00 AM
Any possibilty Guest might be law enforcement? He certainly comes across that way. Marcrex
-
02/23/2011 2:10:00 AM
I am really glad to read that the Police have made such a grave mistake in illegally searching this Law Professor's home. For once, they have finally picked on someone who can and will fight back. The LEO's have been making these 'mistakes' for far to long with impunity since most people can not afford to go after them. I hope that the Professor is correct and is able to take them for everything they own. Then maybe they can get a small taste of what they put innocent citizens through all the time. I hope to see them living under a bridge somewhere in the very near future. Don't back down Professor Freshman we are ALL depending on you to fight for OUR rights as well as your own.
-
02/23/2011 12:36:00 AM
Why don't they have a war on PRESCRIPTION drugs? Oh wait, that cuts into profits of drug companies, never mind.
-
02/22/2011 9:20:00 PM
Amen Wyrdless, well put.
-
02/22/2011 5:38:00 PM
You hide behind anonymity like a sissy. Freshman didn't have any pot moron.
-
02/22/2011 5:37:00 PM
Right becasue you think that the officer shouldn't pay for his crimes. You think the citizens who happen to live near by should pay for his violations of the law through taxation paid at the point of a gun.
You are the sort of idiot who lets the police get away with murder. I hope you get raided by a SWAT team 'accidentally' so you can have your house destroyed for no reason like this man.
-
02/22/2011 5:34:00 PM
"""Freshman, who pledged to sue until "I see [the agents'] houses sold at auction and their kids' college tuitions taken away from them. There will not be a better litigated case this century."""""
This is the face of the American revolution
-
John Smith 02/22/2011 5:28:00 PM
I agree completely! The THUG cops have to stop their BS, and I hope the last paragraph comes true in every aspect!
-
Bill 02/22/2011 5:11:00 PM
Wow, what a well-reasoned, well-constructed and thoughtful response.
How about if you enlighten the rest of us as to the reason pot is illegal?
-
Bill 02/22/2011 5:10:00 PM
The last paragraph was the best one, actually. These statist thugs need to be reminded of that inconvenient truth known as the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, apparently.
-
Guest 02/22/2011 1:04:00 PM
I felt bad for the guy until the last paragraph.
-
Guest 02/22/2011 8:04:00 AM
that freshman guy is a little bitch who needs to stop whining. and pots illegal for a reason you dumbass stoners
-
02/22/2011 1:13:00 AM
Does anyone know whether the officers can be sued as individuals or will the plaintiff have to sue the police department or possibly both ?
-
RichardCarpenter 02/21/2011 7:37:00 PM
"[the agents'] houses sold at auction and their kids' college tuition taken away from them"
Unfortunately that is the only language law enforcement officers understand today. Here's hoping it happens.
Sue them, take their pension, take their college money for their little crumb-crunchers,take their house and ruin their daughter's wedding. Make sure jurisdictions have to pay huge punitive damages instead of hiring more cops. This bad economy is a great time to LAY OFF cops. There are WAY too many cops.
-
Skipfox254 02/21/2011 7:03:00 PM
Awesome.
-
Whappan 02/21/2011 6:55:00 PM
If the commerce clause gives them this authority, then why did they need to pass a constitutional amendment to prohibit alcohol?
-
02/21/2011 6:22:00 PM
If this brings about any change reform etc I will then commend someone, however until then I will say that their arrogance may have finally amounted to an event which CAN NOT be "swept under the rug"... and for this I SAY "IT'S ABOUT TIME!"
-
Sean 02/21/2011 4:16:00 PM
Your hard earned and well spent tax dollars at work. GO AMERICA!!!!
Does anyone remember prohibition? Look how great that turned out. There's this little quote from history that I think is very relevant here:
Those who do not know their history, are doomed to repeat it.
-
Richardabny 02/21/2011 3:08:00 PM
I wish you the best of luck, watch out they do not set you up.
-
02/21/2011 9:21:00 AM
The pigs will never care until they have to pay their own legal bills.
-
Biznunya 02/21/2011 7:06:00 AM
Why not legalize heroin or cocaine? What's the worst that can happen? We have a more controlled substances and we are not paying for addicts in prison? This is how you deal with these things. You have producers and dealers under government control so there is tighter control on distribution and quality and you educate the populous to keep the abuse of such substances under control. This is something that can be done NOW. We can vote and change laws and have corporations that can do it now. And BTW, this method supports personal freedom. To be fair though, if you are a drug dealer, in law enforcement, in law, or operate a prison this may not be good for your industry.
-
02/21/2011 5:29:00 AM
Not exactly the sort of restrained comment lawyers should make. My thoughts on my blog at http://wp.me/peeab-69.
-
chris 02/21/2011 3:26:00 AM
What is it going to take to make this country everything it claims to be?
home of the free?
home of the free to vote for one person to make our decisions for us! Its every negative, demeaning word in the dictionary and it needs to STOP!
Destroy them!
-
The Judge 02/20/2011 9:27:00 PM
Rip the fuckin' PIGS a new one professor, and make them SQUEAL!!! It would be an added benefit if several of them blew their own brains all over the wall once they realize what worthless pieces of excrement they are.
-
02/20/2011 8:56:00 PM
Sure, I'd appreciate the dealer neighbor being hauled away but I wouldn't appreciate being hauled away myself because the police got the warrant wrong. The police got the warrant wrong. They were informed at the time and refused to get the warrant fixed. laughing in the wronged person's face.
If you don't see something wrong with that, you've got a very unique perspective going on there.
-
02/20/2011 8:54:00 PM
The cops executing the warrant have a duty to read the warrant and if they start to find material evidence that the warrant is in error, to take a step back when the situation is under control and make an independent judgment, perhaps calling their supervisors, perhaps calling the judge.
That they did not do so in this case is their mistake, and it looks to be a costly one.
-
02/20/2011 8:52:00 PM
If you are executing a warrant to arrest John Smith, black male 24 and you find John Smith black male 64, you have a basic responsibility to fix the warrant instead of just throwing a possible innocent into the system. The same goes true for any other warrant.
The police quickly found out that their single unit search warrant was made out for a multiple unit building. When that happens, you make a call to fix things and get ready to make profuse apologies if the possible foul up ends up being real. That didn't happen in this case. In short, it's not just the detective's problem.
-
02/20/2011 8:46:00 PM
Our system of justice shields officials from the kind of strict liability that non-law enforcement operates under. But the shielding is not absolute. Law enforcement should know when they've exceeded their warrant and how to fix it. This is a basic job requirement. In this case, they did not follow it.
People who regularly point and shoot weapons and cannot handle basic job requirements are dangerous and should be made an object lesson. Fortunately, it looks like that's going to happen in this case.
-
02/20/2011 8:39:00 PM
The Police who are in charge should have to pay if there is a judgment. If a few of them had to pay out of their pocket instead of the taxpayers this stuff would stop happening.
-
Dick 02/20/2011 8:28:00 PM
FUCK THE POLICE.
-
Anonymous 02/20/2011 7:59:00 PM
No. No. No, It's not that he supports cops, He just HATES LAWYERS, especially law professors! You can't get more American than that!
-
02/20/2011 7:40:00 PM
I didn't know Cosmo had a brother who is a judge!
-
Damonsecloro 02/20/2011 5:35:00 PM
Pig supporter
-
Guest 02/20/2011 4:40:00 PM
Police misconduct to be sure but they should have tazed and soundly beaten the insufferable law professor while they had the chance. In for a penny, in for a pound.
-
Spatacas 02/20/2011 4:06:00 PM
I hate every word in your comment
-
Beldar 02/20/2011 4:03:00 PM
I hate everyone in this story.
-
Guest 02/20/2011 3:51:00 PM
They should settle with him for $1 million per laugh. Then he can laugh all the way to the bank.
-
02/20/2011 3:43:00 PM
What, exactly, would he review them for? If the address is correct?
At this point I want to know what kind of check the Judge is supposed to be on the process.
-
Arthur Brooks 02/20/2011 3:41:00 PM
I sure wish people in San Francisco would find a way to convince this law professor to sue. A thought from Texas.
-
Pablo1753 02/20/2011 3:40:00 PM
It's long past time for the police to be pushed back into a proper relationship with the rest of us. If we've got to get there by weenie lawyers objecting to relatively minor abuses like this, at least it's a start!
-
reACTIONary 02/20/2011 3:40:00 PM
He asked them to get the warrant updated. Why didn't they? The cops need to take the constitution seriously. If the cops don't respect our fundamental law, who will?
-
FrontalRobotomy 02/20/2011 3:14:00 PM
@ Kaniesq It's more about the ILLEGAL search of his home, and how the police that we pay taxes to pay their salaries ILLEGALLY entered a citizens home. Then when the mistake was pointed out they laughed at him... these are not officers who I would want protecting my community if they think such serious infringements on our rights is a laughing matter... You gotta start somewhere to change the way we get treated by the people we employ.
-
Kaniesq 02/20/2011 3:03:00 PM
So the law professor, because he was inconvenienced and humiliated by the flawed search (in which no one was hurt and no property was damaged), wants the cops and their families to suffer. Nice.
-
Paulj2005 02/20/2011 2:45:00 PM
In CA starting Jan 1, 2011 posession of one ounce or less is no longer a misdemeanor punishable by a maximun of $100 fine for persons 21 or over.
.
It is now an infraction with a maximun of $100 fine for persons 21 or OVER.. So it has been decriminalized but not legalized. So no criminal record is started. The officer is NOT to arrest anytone for that alone for that provided they have adequate identification and sign the ticket.
-
02/20/2011 2:43:00 PM
The onus is on the detective who made the sworn statement that these warrants were true and correct.
It isnt on the DEA or SFPD as they were at that moment following the judges order.
Did the detective screw up, yep.
Is he responsible, yep in my book.
Will the city end up bailing his but out via taxpayer dollars, shor 'nuff.
-
Guest 02/20/2011 2:39:00 PM
In the cases my daughter watched while in the courthouse the detective just brought the judge a stack of dozens of search and/or arrest warrants for the judge to sign without him even reading them. He only flipped the pages to sign dozens of them.
First he just asked the detective to swear this were truthful.
The judge did not review each one.
-
Bigfingo 02/20/2011 2:35:00 PM
As an old man used to say to me, Ms. City Tax Payer, Ms. Home Owner, is that you "Get what you payed/voted for". He did use the terms, payed and voted for, interchangeably, depending on the subject mattr at hand. And it fits here because, Ma'am, in this case you 'voted for' the folks who hired these goons in the first place. The 'Perfesser' is merely pointing out this episode as an 'Object Lesson' to further 'educate' your law enforcement personnel. Do you think it might provoke a bit more investigative action prior to attaining the warrant? Here's a question for you: "If you passed a law but were unwilling to enforce it, is it really a law?" You elected them and this is what you got, live with it.
-
Anonymous 02/20/2011 2:27:00 PM
First, it may be ok to legalize joints, but I do not think anyone seriously thinks we are going to legalize Heroin or Cocaine anymore than the thousands of other drugs that are now controlled, so drug dealing is not going away.
Second, it IS illegal now, so the problem needs to addressed until the law is changed.
-
Bigfingo 02/20/2011 2:14:00 PM
Burn the bastards down. The law applies to 'them' as well as we, victims of the Law. But what do you expect when they hire these "Bar Bouncer" types, who enjoy being 'smart-asses' (BTW the only smart part on many), to these positions. Who qualifies these guys plan of action before granting an obviously flawed warrant. They "just made a mistake" shouldn't cut it our world. Doing this kind of work, a mistake, can cost someone a life (Cop or Home Owner). This was a failure to exercise 'due diligence' and that would be an actionable offense, or at least served with a lawsuit, in the real world. You even admit that their behavior was "unlawful". Them that live by the sword gonna' die by the sword.
-
Biznunya 02/20/2011 2:08:00 PM
I can understand his anger, although his comments are a little out of line. The government should be sued, and we should we reform our drug laws. The US has the highest incarceration rate in the western world (0.7%, 2+ million people in jail) and spent over a trillion dollars directly (add another trillion for indirect costs) on the war on drugs and what has it got us? You can't govern peoples vices. Legalize it, tax it, and educate the populous.
-
Fleetdefender 02/20/2011 1:57:00 PM
Fuck the police...fucking jackbooted thugs been doing this sort of shit all over the country with these crazy nazi like no knock raids where innocents get shot and the police skate. Time to take the war back to those motherfuckers.
-
Anonymouse 02/20/2011 1:54:00 PM
seriously this story disgusts me. the guy who had his home illegally searched is a super asshole. These cops MADE NO MISTAKE. The mistake made was by the judge who gave them the warrant or by whomever failed to brief these cops properly. They are just doing there job, suing them is counter productive, I agree he deserves compensation from the state but going on a personal vendetta against the cops is just retarded.
-
Fleetdefender 02/20/2011 1:54:00 PM
Like the fucking nazis were "just" following orders. Time to remind these jackbooted thugs that they are supposed to be PROTECTING us, they are supposed to be one of us, instead most of the cops have lost sight of that and are acting like a occupying army.
-
Fleetdefender 02/20/2011 1:51:00 PM
Well exactly how do you think that the police "convince" you to remain in place if it isn't the implied threat of a gun. I say bravo!
Sue the crap out of the police...this drug war is out of control. Too many innocents have been caught in the crossfire.
-
Ffret 02/20/2011 1:48:00 PM
Umm, Anonymous, if drugs were legalized, this wouldn't happen to you. Likewise, gun battles between rival dealers in residential neighborhoods are bad things, but this is caused by prohibition. Get it?
-
Uofaross 02/20/2011 1:38:00 PM
Or if the war on drugs were ended the person seeking the drugs could just buy them at the cigarrete lane at their local store, where taxes would be collected.