Prop 13: The Building-Sized Loopholes Corporations Exploit

image
Illustration by David Flaherty.

Copper thieves are pilfering copper. Carjackers are jacking cars. Home burglars, however, are not making off with homes. The plot of the recent film Tower Heist did not involve stealing an office tower. It remains challenging to abscond with a building.

But what if you could? Bolt-cutters and a flatbed are always handy, but you wouldn't need them. All it would take is a pen and a sheaf of documents to sign — and the ability to keep the facts away from the county assessor's office. That's how it worked here in San Francisco, where billion-dollar companies conspired to conceal a skyscraper's change of ownership, depriving the city of millions of dollars in tax payments.

Years of litigation in the One Market Plaza case, triggered by Wayne Lesser, earned the city $23 million. Lesser got nothing.
Michael Short
Years of litigation in the One Market Plaza case, triggered by Wayne Lesser, earned the city $23 million. Lesser got nothing.
One Market Plaza remains the only
commercial property in the state in which a concealed change of ownership resulted in fraud penalties.
Michael Short
One Market Plaza remains the only commercial property in the state in which a concealed change of ownership resulted in fraud penalties.

The towering case of fraud was yet another unforeseen consequence of Proposition 13. Thirty-three years ago, the specter of indigent grandparents being taxed into the streets led Californians to overwhelmingly approve the ballot measure. Prior to 1978, assessors didn't much care who owned a building — property was appraised yearly and taxed based on that valuation. Prop. 13 changed things with the subtlety of a thunderclap. Property values are now essentially frozen at the year the owner obtained the real estate, and only reassessed when it changes hands. Determining ownership — and when it changes — is paramount.

In most cases, it's relatively straightforward: Gavin Newsom sells his home for $2.75 million, a deed is recorded, and the new owner pays property taxes on a reassessed base. But, under state and federal law, corporations are afforded the same rights enjoyed by individuals; Mitt Romney was artless when he told a crowd "Corporations are people, my friend" — yet he was factually correct. And while it's fairly simple to ascertain when the Newsoms sell their house, determining the ownership of property held by massive conglomerates or intricate partnerships can be maddening. Especially when they want it to be.

Most new buyers are left with little recourse but to grumble that their property taxes are many times higher than those paid by longstanding residents and businesses. Recent buyers in every California city are subsidizing their neighbors. But corporations with no overriding desire to shell out millions in taxes do have options — and access to sharp legal minds. The definition of what constitutes a change of control of corporate property allows for remarkable leeway in avoiding a reassessment, shrinking needy cities' tax hauls by billions. Assessors awaiting deeds as a result of mergers, acquisitions, and other corporate transactions may wait forever.

A business selling 100 percent of its real-estate interest without triggering a reassessment isn't hypothetical — or even an oddity. "These kinds of transactions are being done all the time," says USF law professor Dan Lathrope. "Anyone doing a big real-estate transaction knows what triggers reassessments." It's all perfectly legal — companies can effectively change hands many times over, but never in a way resulting in a deed heading to the assessor's office, and buildings' tax bases remain at levels from the Carter administration.

That's the case even when the line between cunning and devious is breached. In San Francisco, a pair of Fortune 500 companies fraudulently cloaked a change of ownership of One Market Plaza, one of the city's largest office buildings — to prevent a reappraisal that would have upped the structure's value from some $113 million to around $400 million. These firms were caught and made to pay — astoundingly, in retrospect — but not in a manner inspiring hope for nabbing future purveyors of fraud. The scheme was sniffed out not by proactive city employees but private attorneys. Even once the machinations were laid bare, the city repeatedly attempted to go easy on the guilty parties. The case plodded through court for nearly 18 years, spinning such a convoluted web of litigation that, at one point, the city sued itself.

One Market Plaza remains the city's only instance of fraud penalties being levied following a concealed change of ownership; the California Assessors' Association can't recall another case statewide involving commercial property. And after all these years, Assessor Phil Ting admits the city is no less vulnerable. "It would be great to review a lot more properties to determine if we're missing changes of ownership," he says. "But it would be very, very difficult to detect."

In the meantime, society's wealthiest and most powerful — "the 1 percent" in the parlance of those who were until recently encamped in the shadow of One Market Plaza — exploit loopholes in Prop. 13 to grow wealthier and more powerful still.

Loopholes large enough to push a building through.


Attorney Wayne Lesser had been in any number of contentious legal meetings — but usually he knew whom he was meeting with. In a sit-down with One Market Plaza officials, everyone introduced himself — save for one guy at the end of the table. When asked who he was, he responded "That's not important." Then things got weird.

Lesser's client, Joe Abouab, was a Moroccan-born sandwich-maker whom One Market Plaza was evicting in order to install a food court. Abouab had three years left on his lease. All Lesser wanted was "some moving expenses, some juice." It wouldn't have taken much. But the guy without a name wasn't having it. Twenty years have passed, but Lesser recalls exactly what came next. "He looked at me and said 'We're not gonna pay him a dime. We're gonna bury him.'"

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
10 comments
Roland Shield
Roland Shield

Mr. Eskenazi, Your article is well-researched and informative to say the least. And I feel that I am reasonably informed enough to make this assessment (no pun intended). I am a former employee of the California Wildlife Conservation Board and I saw these sort of shenanigans being orchestrated for "conservation" properties for nearly 5 years before I was drummed out as a would-be whistleblower. The only success I has was getting California Watch to post a fairly weak article that only vaguely scratched the surface of this phenomenon [ ref. http://californiawatch.org/env... ] . Let me be clear here: there are hundreds of transactions representing hundreds of millions of dollars in unreported assessed and collected taxes across California every year. And yes, many of the "hogs" are in places such as Sonoma and Napa Counties, but they are everywhere to be sure.

VivlianWozz
VivlianWozz

I am a 27 years old doctor,mature and beautiful. and now i am seeking a good man who can give me real love, so i got a sername Andromeda2002 on Agedate.СòM, a nice and free place for younger women and older men,or older women and younger men, to interact with each other.Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.

Lucia Jobs
Lucia Jobs

Tall big people Dating Site---【TallConnect.C○m】---we've made it the largest

tall people dating site. Find someone who is tall, sexy, loving, caring, and good

looking. No joke. We've got plenty of tall people here. Join and browse for FREE.

VivlianWozz
VivlianWozz

Another restaurant cliaimed to use fresh mozz arella cheese,where it's dishes were actually made with economy cheddar.the "fresh pasta"advertieshed on another meau tumed out to be frozen.--Agedate. ℃⊙M--a nice and free place for younger women and older men,or older women and younger men,to interact with each other.

Teotwawki Jones
Teotwawki Jones

Actually, property taxes are raised annually and tied to inflation. In the 12 years I've been in my home, my taxes have gone up about 25%. By the time I pay off the mortgage, they will have almost doubled.

Joe Eskenazi
Joe Eskenazi

Sir --

In California, there is a cap on how much property taxes can be raised: 2 percent per year. Also, if your tax base is higher than the value of the home, you are entitled, via Proposition 8, to apply to the assessor for a downward reassessment every year.

Best,

JE

Partyisover
Partyisover

Why are we allowing our adult children, who were born and raised in California, to pay for the selfish-sins of their grandparents? When their grandparents were young, they bought homes all over California at dirt cheap prices with low-low interest rates. Yet, when they were given the opportunity to pay-it-forward, they instead decided to keep everything for themselves.

Dear old Granpa and Granma voted for Prop 13 which keeps their property taxes at the 1978 tax rate, that was back in the good old days, when a gallon Gas was only 63 cents.

Briansays
Briansays

the lesson here ispeople think government is corrupt, wasteful, incompetant and always looking to expand the social welfare stateergo they hate it more than they do the rich and greedy in the private sector

Dreamer
Dreamer

In a perfect world, Mean Greedy People and Mean Gun Slinging People would cancel-out each other (two equally gruesome entities neutralize each others power)

 
©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Loading...