When news broke that the city is holding the bag for the tens of millions of dollars the America's Cup Organizing Committee hasn't raised, Supervisor John Avalos gave an impassioned lamentation. "I was fucking played. All the members of the Board of Supervisors were fucking played," he wailed. "I am totally fucking ashamed."

This showed remarkable candor — but not remarkable foresight. Every city official tasked with adding numbers and looking at contracts had warned of this exact scenario. SF Weekly and other newspapers had done the same, repeatedly, in 2010, 2011, 2012, and this year too. Decision-makers may or may not have been played, but they were certainly informed.

One can only predict the impassioned lamentations due to be inspired by the Central Subway. Over the past decade, a bevy of reports and articles have revealed the bizarre logistics for the proposed Muni line to Chinatown — and, potentially, beyond — could actually reduce passengers' ability to get to their desired destinations in a timely fashion. In that time, the project's price tag has jumped from around $647 million to some $1.6 billion, while anticipated daily ridership dropped from 100,000 to an optimistic 2012 estimate of 35,100. In 2007, Muni reported that the subway would be a net gain, reducing Muni's operating and maintenance expenses by $23.9 million. In 2010, that number was glumly revised: The subway is now expected to eat $15.2 million in yearly O&M costs — siphoning resources away from a perpetually underfunded system.

Last year the Wall Street Journal labeled the subway "a case study in government incompetence and wasted taxpayer money." So, decision-makers have been informed. And we're building this thing anyway.

The most recent twist in the Central Subway saga is a plan rapidly wending its way through the city's approval process: to unearth two tunnel boring machines via the carcass of North Beach's derelict Pagoda Palace theater, some 2,000 feet beyond the future Chinatown station. In December, this extraction was priced as adding $3 million to project costs. Earlier this month it was estimated as an $8 million job; it now stands at $9.15 million. It warrants mentioning that this money is not derived from the federal manna funding much of the Central Subway endeavor. This wad hails from Muni's own kitty — "reserve funds, fund balance, and operating savings."

That's not the only shaky proposition. Lawrence Karp, a consulting geotechnical engineer hired by opponents of the Central Subway, submitted several reports claiming attempts to excavate beneath the Pagoda Palace will be a complex and dodgy fiasco. In a Feb. 13 memo, John Funghi, Muni's Central Subway project director, chided Karp for providing "incorrect information" about the proposed Pagoda dig, and "misrepresenting" the impacts of the construction. Karp testily notes that his "incorrect information" was pulled straight from a Planning Department addendum for the project, and backed down from none of his disturbing written claims.

"If an old man is crossing the street and you hit him with your car, you can't say 'he was old, he was gonna die anyway,'" Karp says. "So when you go and excavate underneath buildings that are 100 years old, on sand, with very high water tables — there is virtually no chance those buildings won't be damaged." Asked if the costs will exceed the $9.15 million in local funds Muni is now ponying up, he says, "That's sort of obvious."

What's less obvious, at least on one level, is why the tunnel-boring machines will be unearthed from North Beach while the final designed and funded station is way back in Chinatown. Muni has offered a bevy of explanations as to why the most expedient plan is to bore a pair of 2,000-foot tunnels — estimated cost: $70-plus million — to retrieve a pair of machines with a resale value Funghi has tabbed at $4.4 million.

Extracting the machines by crane at the Chinatown station, described in the project's Environmental Impact Report as a two-week job, is now infeasible, reports Muni. The boring machines will be so deep, says spokesman Paul Rose, that digging down to retrieve them would be time-consuming and expensive. Funghi has said that digging sideways out of the tunnel right-of-way and abandoning the machines underground would entail "significant environmental work," "approval by the property owners ... and appropriate compensation." But it seems there's plenty of all that at the Pagoda Palace, too.

The concept of digging an additional few thousand feet for the sake of extracting boring machines puzzled experienced engineers. "It's surprising to me it would be worth taking them out," says Douglas Hamilton, the engineering geologist for the Devil's Slide project. Why not, he asks, simply mothball the machines at a point in Chinatown past where future trains will go? Why not bury them beneath the right-of-way? Or why not scrap them and haul out the pieces the way they came in? Rose notes "the new machines that were manufactured for the Central Subway were not built to be subsequently dismantled." Perhaps that was a mistake. Or perhaps not. Because this way Muni gets to dig its long-desired tunnel into North Beach.

While the final funded stop is in Chinatown, Muni has the feds' blessing to dig into North Beach — provided it does so "for construction purposes" related to the current (funded) phase of the project. Digging the tunnels as a means of extracting the boring machines is considered "for construction purposes." But extending subway service to North Beach and, eventually, Fisherman's Wharf is Muni's ultimate goal — and no one is ignoring this elephant in the tunnel. In 2007, Funghi told the Examiner that a tunnel to North Beach "would lay the groundwork for a future phase three of this project." This month, he wrote in a memo, "given that the city has pursued and achieved funding approvals to extend the tunnel to Columbus Avenue, doing so as part of the current project would be more cost effective than doing so in the future."

Boring on ahead to North Beach simply because it's easier to do so with federal funding — while "establishing the groundwork" for the unstudied and unfunded next phase of the Central Subway — is a dicey proposition: Looking at the big picture, it may even be a good idea to put upward of $70 million into a North Beach tunnel on the feds' dime. But it strains credulity to couch this — as Muni does — as the most expedient way to get $4.4 million worth of equipment out of the earth.

How to spend the feds' money is not an entirely trivial matter. If the Central Subway goes over budget, the additional dollars will be pried from local sources. An audit by the firm CGR Management Consultants pegged the likelihood of the Central Subway coming in on budget at 30 percent.

That report was requested by the Board of Supervisors, and delivered to them — in 2011. They are informed.

Show Pages
My Voice Nation Help

San Francisco is a dense city. It makes sense to have light rail. I live in the Sunset district; if there was a direct rail line to Chinatown and North Beach, I would hang out and spend money there more often. The author makes it seem like digging a tunnel to North Beach is some sort of nefarious secret plan that the MTA wants to foist on everyone. I think a subway that stops at Portsmouth Square is a joke, but a subway that goes all the way to Fisherman's Wharf makes a lot of sense. What is the real problem here? Telegraph Hill dwellers that want everything to stay the way they think it has always been? Do they actually enjoy riding the 30-Stockton or do they drive everywhere?


This seems to be their MO.  Come up with absurd plans, ram them through, the price skyrockets, the word done is less than advertised , and the taxpayers end up footing the bill.  Seems to me that if the sponsors can't pay for it, THE EVENT GETS CANCELLED, unless those who got "played" get the bill.  We can take it out of their paychecks and pension plans.  Like how the Feds are going after people on disability or in extreme poverty to pay back defaulted student loans.  As for the boring plan, it's about turning Columbus and NOrth Beach into the next Fisherman's Wharf, and this is a way to get rid of tenants and businesses, replacing them with Starbuck's and franchise and chain stores. 


What a debacle and waste of taxpayer money.  And why is Joe Eskenazi the only investigative reporter in this entire town?  The Chronicle just reports on press releases from City Hall.  The Bay Guardian just writes about taxing everything and how wonderful everything public is and how horrible everything private is.  It's sad that the SF Weekly is the only newspaper in town that investigates how our tax dollars are wasted.

©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.