Uber Alles: Rideshares Are Convenient, Until They Aren't -- Then You're on Your Own

No one is ever going to truly know just what transpired in that UberX vehicle between aggrieved passenger James Alva and equally indignant driver Daveea Whitmire. It's a boozy, high-tech Rashomon, with both men offering utterly contradicting narratives of the ill-fated voyage, wholly exonerating themselves while wholly damning the other.

Alva says his attempts to offer directions for the 0.7-mile voyage from a Castro bar to his Upper Market home launched Whitmire into a racist, homophobic tirade against "dirty Mexican faggots" before the driver twice swatted the iPhone out of Alva's hands. Whitmire denies this, claiming instead Alva refused to disclose a destination, and belittled him from the start. "He's an evil dude," Whitmire says. "I never touched the guy."

Per Uber's computer-generated receipt, the entire ride lasted just 2 minutes, 55 seconds.

Both men unloaded their conflicting tales onto the cops shortly after 2 a.m. on Nov. 24. The responding officer generated an incident report that reads like a page-long shrug. It does, however, reveal that Alva informed a 911 dispatcher he'd been "punched in the face," but admitted to police he hadn't. That, along with the wildly contradicting narratives, led the cops to take no action. Alva and Whitmire went their separate ways, both fuming, and both clinging to their disparate versions of the truth.

It was not an evening that lived up to Uber's pledge of "safe, stylish, and convenient" transport.

In just a few short years, Uber, along with its fellow app-based, so-called "rideshare" operations, has eviscerated the taxi industry. San Francisco's ascendant population has rapidly modified its migratory behavior: Those exiting bars and clubs are now wont to look down and punch on a smartphone rather than look up and hail a cab.

For people who simply desire to get from here to there, this isn't a bad thing. It's hard to imagine a business model more ripe for disruption than the taxi: The system manages to compound eons of corruption, inefficiency, cronyism, and caked-on sleaziness with stultifying layers of overarching regulations. Uber et al. have stripped the gears out of the archaic machine; it runs smoothly out of the device in the palm of your hand, a cutting-edge service for a cutting-edge city.

And that's all well and good. Until something goes wrong. And then you're on your own.

Once the established components of the livery business have been disposed of, there's nothing left to put back when the system falls apart. Not that Uber has any desire to do so. It and other companies adamantly disavow responsibility for mishaps befalling those who drive or ride in the cars bearing their imprimatur. Along with the rather fanciful notion that these billion-dollar entities are "rideshares" akin to the grab-a-spot-in-my car-when-I'm-goin'-to-L.A. public service announcements once featured on community radio stations, the industry boilerplate is that rideshares are merely high-tech platforms connecting riders and drivers, floating in an ethereal realm above the legal and regulatory fray.

There is, however, a very low-tech gadget that would have neatly resolved Alva and Whitmire's intractable recollections. A gadget, in fact, that has been mandated in San Francisco taxis since 2003.

It's called a camera. But Uber vehicles don't come equipped with cameras — a decision spawning winners and losers. The winner is Uber.

The losers are everyone else.

It's difficult to watch a screen split into fourths, with the quadrants displaying an interior shot of a taxi, a view out the front window, a GPS map, and the vehicle's speed. It's even more difficult to watch what's filmed.

Images captured by these taxi cameras and viewed by your humble narrator include family after family rattling around the vehicle during accidents; hot beverages erupting onto sweaters post-impact; or a violent couple exchanging smacks, kicks, and nose-gouges. But the most ghastly footage of all is a little boy darting, with his back to traffic, in front of a cab, sailing through the air, and landing in a heap. Furious family members race into the street. The driver immediately calls 911.

The video in question reveals that the cab was traveling at exactly 25 mph — the speed limit — while the driver was looking forward with both hands placed on the wheel. The boy, who was not seriously injured, all but leaped in front of the car.

A camera costs hundreds of dollars. But legal settlements cost many thousands, and legal judgments can run into the millions.

Along with their app-based kin, Uber vehicles are camera-free zones. Any pedestrian or passenger witnessing a cabbie driving like Steve McQueen or engaging in other undesirable behavior can simply note the taxi's number and the time of day, call 311, and the digital footage should find its way to a Municipal Transportation Authority inspector. But with Uber and its ilk, it's your word against theirs.

Simply put: Rashomon.

When asked why Uber vehicles don't come equipped with cameras, spokesman Andrew Noyes chalks it up to the company not owning the cars or employing the drivers. But when queried if Uber would contract with a third-party car service that didn't equip its vehicles with seat belts, he replies in the negative.

So why not require seat belts and cameras? "I don't feel comfortable talking about that on the record," Noyes says. "I don't want to play that game." He does say that Uber goes "to great lengths" to ensure the aforementioned "safe, stylish, and convenient" experience.

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help

this writer has the best understanding of any article I've seen, (on the web or anywhere), and I've driven a cab, day and night for almost twenty years.  I now drive for uber but in a town car, it's a big distinction.  I'm making about what I did when I owned a cab and  drove for a company that owned several hundred authorities in a major city. I'm in favor of total degegulation and an open medalion system, give them away.

Cynthia McGarvie
Cynthia McGarvie

As with all transportation decisions, always use your best discretion.

Tyler Boshard
Tyler Boshard

I've had nothing but good experiences with Uber, however, the few times I've taken a taxi, have all been horrible.


I've wondered when we're going see some big lawsuits for companies like Uber, airbnb, etc. as a result of a horrible accident, fire...

©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.