Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Monday, March 30, 2009

Foie Gras Follies: San Francisco's Symbolic Resolution, Ignoring Lesson from Chicago

Posted By on Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM

click to enlarge Foie_gras_en_cocotte.jpg
When San Francisco supervisors passed an entirely symbolic resolution last Tuesday commending city restaurants that don't serve foie gras, they were ahead of the state law -- SB 1520, passed in 2004, which essentially bans foie gras production or sale in California, as of July 1, 2012.

But they ignored the lesson of Chicago, not quite as renowned a foodie mecca as San Francisco, but apparently a more realistic one, whose city council banned restaurants from serving foie gras in April 2006 and dropped it in May of 2008.

Mayor Richard Daley said that the ban was the "silliest ordinance" that the city council had ever passed, saying it made Chicago the "laughingstock of the nation."  Many Chicago restaurants continued to serve foie gras, despite the ban. (In fact, foie gras acquired something of an speakeasy-style allure much as did alcohol during our nation's great experiment with Prohibition. And we all know how well that turned out.)

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals decried the overturning of the ban in Chicago. (Big surprise.)


The production of foie gras involves overfeeding of ducks and

geese in order to produce enlarged fatty livers. Proponents of banning

foie gras call this force-feeding, insisting on its violence and

cruelty. Proponents of banning foie gras, interestingly enough, can

turn to rather violent and cruel methods their ownselves. In 2003 they

targeted chef Laurent Manrique,

who had partnered with two El Salvadoran brothers to produce and sell

artisanal foie gras. His  home was spray-painted, acid was poured on

his car, and the shop, Sonoma Saveurs, was broken into, also

spray-painted, had water left turned on after plumbing was plugged with

cement, damaging not just Manrique's shop but others adjoining his in a

historic 1842 adobe building on the Sonoma Plaza. Most frightening, and

reminiscent of tactics of anti-abortion groups, videotapes showing

Manrique and his family inside their home were delivered, along with

threatening letters.


Coincidentally, of course, Sonoma Saveurs

no longer has a retail store, and Manrique is no longer associated with

it. (Re-writing history somewhat, a current staffer said when asked

that Manrique had only been involved with their adjacent restaurant.)


Despite

similar techniques being aimed at Chicago chef and native of Dordogne,

France, Didier Durand -- while campaigning to end the ban, he was

threatened, his restaurant's windows were blood-stained, and its patio

was vandalized -- he persevered. Now he plans to add a foie gras museum to his restaurant.


Many

restauranteurs and others feel that PETA and their ilk are using foie

gras as a stalking horse. If they succeed in banning it nationwide,

soon to follow would be, among other foodstuffs, lobster, veal, and

chicken.


The delicacy is produced by only

three artisans in the US, and consumed in miniscule amounts, as local

Incanto restaurant owner Mark Pastore writes in a long, thoughtful, and

eminently worth reading open letter entitled Shock and Foie: The War against Dietary Self-Determinism, (already presciently linked by our Robert Lauriston here weeks before the SF resolution was passed). 


He discourses learningly on gavage, the force-feeding technique used on animals who, unlike humans, have no gag reflex, and which is used routinely to feed ill or injured duck and geese.

As Pastore wrote, it's not cruelty per se that cause the foie gras producers to be 
the current cause celebre:
     "Foie gras famers -- and those who serve it -- are targeted for simple and eminently
      practical reasons: This is quite literally the smallest and most defenseless segment
      of the U.S. meat industry...the attack on foie gras consumption in the U.S. is 
      therefore a tactic...Don't start with a full frontal assault on a food that everybody
      eats." 

(I.e., trying to ban chicken would have your everyday chicken-eaters up in arms, as well as producers and restauranteurs, despite the well-known battery-farm situations as seen in such movies as Food Inc. Beware the power of KFC and KFC eaters, as PETA and their ilk know well. Start small.)

San Francisco's resolution was championed by Ross Mirkarimi, who was quoted

in advance of the resolution's passing about the deep thinking that

went into its creation: "I'll be honest with you, we don't put that

much time into this. We craft these within minutes."


Gavin Newsom's press secretary, Nathan Ballard, using sarcasm as his weapon of choice, had this to say

when asked his opinion of the resolution: "Clearly Supervisor Mirkarimi

has crafted a solution to one of the most challenging issues facing our

city. This landmark legislation will soon seek its place in the history

books."


Still, since Berkeley declared itself a nuclear-free zone, no nuclear warheads have gone off within its city limits, nor nuclear power plants have been constructed. Who's laughing now?

  • Pin It

Tags: , ,

About The Author

Meredith Brody

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook

Slideshows

  • SuperHero Street Fair 2014

    From Batman to Superman to steampunk, people dressed up as their favorite superhero — or villain — for the annual SuperHero Street Fair held along Isails Creek, at the end of Indiana Street, on Saturday, Sept. 27. There was food, drinks, and lots of EDM music to dance to — check out all our photos form the event. Photography by Christopher Victorio.

  • @Large: Ai Weiwei on Alcatraz Exhibit
    Nathaniel Y. Downes brings back photographs from exhibit @Large: Ai Weiwei on Alcatraz. @Large runs through April 26, 2015.