Categories: News

Trump’s Twitter Behavior is Officially Unconstitutional


In a single day, two issues that loom large over Twitter — hate speech and President Donald Trump — had significant breakthroughs.

A panel of three federal judges unanimously ruled Tuesday that Trump is violating the First Amendment by blocking critics on Twitter, the platform he regularly uses to announce major policy decisions. The ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirms a lower court’s ruling that updates the Consitution to today’s social media era.

A 2017 lawsuit filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University argued that Trump operates his Twitter account for government use, not just personal, and that preventing people he disagrees with from information is unconstitutional. The three judges agreed, saying he can’t exclude critics or shut down online dialogue he doesn’t care for.

The same morning, Twitter announced it would require the removal of tweets that target religious groups once reported to the company. The San Francisco-based company listed fake yet disturbing examples of such tweets that often compared a group to animals, viruses, and insects.

Tuesday’s announcement is an update to the September 2018 policy that simply prohibits dehumanization of “anyone based on membership in an identifiable group, as this speech can lead to offline harm.” Both moves were informed by researcher Susan Benesch, who called language that compares an identifiable group to animals or insects as “hallmark” of dangerous speech that can lead to violence.

Twitter asked for responses after the 2018 policy update and consistently found calls for clearer language around dehumanization, list specific examples, narrow down what “identifiable groups” is (i.e. religion), and to consistently enforce the policy.

“Twitter’s policy update is a very positive step in the right direction,” says Madihha Ahussain, counsel for Muslim Advocates. “Muslims, Jews, Sikhs and other religious minorities are often targeted with dangerous slurs and conspiracy theories and we applaud genuine efforts to remove this content from social media platforms. However, the effectiveness of this new policy will depend on how Twitter enforces it.”

It also remains to be seen how the courts or Twitter may force Trump to unblock critics and prevent him from blocking more accounts that disagree with him on the platform — and whether they’ll ever remove any of his own dehumanizing tweets.

Ida Mojadad

Ida Mojadad is the Staff Writer at SF Weekly. You can reach her at (415)-359-2728 or imojadad@sfweekly.com. Follow her on Twitter at @idamoj.

Recent Posts

Test Dept., Severed Heads, and Paul Barker at DNA Lounge, September 12, 2019

DNA Lounge, Cold Waves industrial music festival and Bodyshock presented a night of industrial music at DNA Lounge this past…

2 hours ago

Laying Down the Claw

Have you marked yourself “safe” during the Great White Claw Shortage of 2019? Or have you been camped out outside…

4 hours ago

Bill Needed for S.F. Public Bank Clears State Legislature

A state bill necessary for San Francisco to launch its own bank finished its run through the California Legislature on…

6 hours ago

San Francisco Knows How to Stop Global Warming — Will It?

Humans have 12 years to drastically change all of their habits or the Earth will bake into an unlivable hellscape.…

5 days ago

Movie Review: Haunt

Rated R. Opens Friday at the Presidio Theater. We’re fully into the single-word, post-meaning era of movie titles, so it…

5 days ago

Movie Review: Raise Hell: The Life and Times of Molly Ivins

Not rated. Opens Friday at the Opera Plaza Cinema. Should a newspaper writer be allowed to say things that might…

5 days ago