Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Turns Out City *Was* Officially Lobbying at State Level for More Government Secrecy -- Yes, Again

Posted By on Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:01 AM

click to enlarge Smile!
  • Smile!
Yesterday we reported that San Francisco was listed as a "supporter" of an Assembly bill that would, among other things, curtail public access to government data. At the time, we weren't sure exactly what being a "supporter" entailed, but now we are. Paid city lobbyist Steven Wallauch penned a letter on behalf of San Francisco to bill author Assemblyman Mike Eng (D-Monterey Park).

This means that, once again, San Francisco has officially lobbied in Sacramento for a bill that would create more government secrecy -- which is arguably a direct violation of the city's Sunshine Ordinance. Here's the nitty-gritty:

If this charge sounds familiar to you, it should: Government transparency activists cried foul when it was revealed last month that San Francisco had officially lobbied in Sacramento for a law that entitles city Muni vehicles to be outfitted with cameras -- but disallows public access to whatever data those cameras may catch. Now it turns out that the city has lobbied for Eng's bill -- that, similarly, would place cameras on street-sweeper vehicles and also restrict public access to the images. Open government activists are mystified as to how the city can justify this, considering the following passage from San Francisco's Sunshine Ordinance: "Funds of the City and County of San Francisco ... shall not be used to

support any lobbying efforts to restrict public access to records,

information, or meetings ..."

Richard Knee, the chairman of the city's Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, said that San Francisco's lobbying for Eng's bill -- AB 1336 -- "violates both the spirit and the letter of the Sunshine Ordinance."

Knee said that his task force could block any local attempts to restrict public access to street-sweeper cameras -- or, for that matter, Muni bus cameras.

"If, for any reason, the city wanted to withhold a portion of that footage from public view, they'd have to say clearly why they were doing it," he says. "If someone were to request access to some footage shot from one of those cameras, was denied, and then filed a Sunshine complaint, we could find a violation. Unless there's a specific reason for withholding the footage, access should be given."

For those wondering what's the big deal over the government refusing to release footage from its bus- or sweeper-mounted cameras meant to bust discourteous drivers, here's a term that may resonate: "secret evidence."

"This is evidence which the public would never get to see. You can see

any other kind of evidence introduced in a court proceeding," said

Terry Francke, general counsel of the open government group CalAware. "This treats parking violations as some esoteric exception to the rule."

City Attorney spokesman Matt Dorsey said he is unsure whether the city attorney's office was ever consulted on whether lobbying for such bills is permissible under city law.

  • Pin It

Tags: , , , , ,

About The Author

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi

Bio:
Joe Eskenazi was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left. "Your humble narrator" is a staff writer and columnist for SF Weekly, which he has written for since 2007. He resides in the Excelsior with his wife, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers... more

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook

Slideshows

  • Cirque du Soleil Returns to San Francisco
    Cirque du Soleil returns to AT&T park with their current production Kurious: Cabinet of Curiosities. Photographs by Richard Haick.
  • Slayer @ Fox Theater
    Slayer, Exodus and Suicidal Tendencies performed at the Fox Theater in Oakland on November 12, 2014. Photographs by Richard Haick.