When the city controller yesterday announced state budget cuts
will deal San Francisco a $26.5 million punch in the gut, your humble narrator immediately thought of Jon Lovitz. Just as the Saturday Night Live
nebbish once pitched himself to single women with the battle cry "Lower your standards!" so the controller's report was a classic example of bad news being a welcome respite from horrific news.
Sure, a $26.5 rug being pulled out from beneath the city is bad -- but it's not nearly as bad as the $36.7 million the controller predicted we could be out back on Aug. 4.
(The $18 million the city budgeted in reserve, which looked ridiculously inadequate for a while, is now merely inadequate).
The report -- which you can see here
-- is concise, detailed, and rather readable. Here's the breakdown on who "won" by losing the least:
- Temporary Assistance for Needy Family shelter funds and employment subsidization was anticipated to take a $2.8 million hit in August -- but now stands to lose $3.5 million;
- Funds for children's immunization and health programs were anticipated to lose $600,000 -- but will be short $900,000.
- CalWORK welfare to work employment services was bracing for a $9 million hit. It will "only" lose $2.9 million;
Congrats -- you didn't lose anything
- Child Welfare Services, anticipating a $4.5 million shortfall, now faces cuts of $2.9 million.
Breaking even is the gold standard these days, it would seem.
- State support for Healthy Families (facing a $2.2 million cut); and a bevy of Medi-Cal related information systems (facing $2.4 million shortfall) won't be cut at all.
Per the "mini-budget" deal hammered out by Supervisor John Avalos
during the joyous prior budget ordeal, Mayor Gavin Newsom now has 21 days to submit his budget plan to the Board (that'd be Oct. 5). The Board then has the next 45 days to "amend, adopt, or take no action" to the mayor's handiwork.
Budget deficits -- they never