Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Monday, October 26, 2009

Chronic City: L.A.'s Marijuana Dispensary Ban Could Cost City Millions

Posted By on Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Los Angeles' proposed medical Marijuana ordinance -- which would ban the sale of pot at dispensaries -- could cost the city $36 million to $74 million in lost sales tax, according to a Marijuana advocacy group.

800px-Medical-Marijuana-shop.crop.jpg
Photo by lavocado, Wikimedia Commons
Open for business on L.A.'s Ventura Boulevard... but for how long?
Dale Gieringer, coordinator for the California chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), said the proposed ordinance, supported by L.A. District Attorney Steve Cooley, would "effectively shut down the city's Marijuana distribution system by banning all sales of Marijuana and sharply curtailing collectives' ability to grow and obtain medicine."

No other city or county in California has regulated collectives while banning sales, according to NORML.

Under the proposed ordinance, also prominently backed by L.A. City Attorney Carmen Trutanich, only nonprofit medical Marijuana collectives -- groups of qualified patients with physicians' recommendations and their primary caregivers -- would be allowed to cultivate the herb to relieve the symptoms of serious illnesses.

click to enlarge Dr. Dale Gieringer, California NORML: L.A. dispensary ban "Ill-conceived" - NORML.ORG
  • NORML.org
  • Dr. Dale Gieringer, California NORML: L.A. dispensary ban "Ill-conceived"
​"Los Angeles would be foolish to pass this unworkable,

ill-conceived ordinance," Gieringer said. "Not only would it cost $36

to $74 million in lost sales taxes and thousands of jobs, but the city

can expect serious legal challenges in the courts. The city would be

better advised to adopt a system of licensed regulation and taxes,

which has proven successful elsewhere in the state."


In Oakland,

considered by many a statewide model for the orderly regulation of

medical Marijuana dispensaries, voters recently passed, with 80

percent of the vote, a special tax on dispensary sales that is expected to

put millions of dollars into city coffers. Cities that NORML lauds as

having "successful dispensary regulations" also include San Francisco

and West Hollywood. According to the pro-pot organization, these city

governments are already collecting millions in taxes and license fees

from dispensaries.


A survey by California

NORML found the dispensaries pay an average of $82,000 in sales

tax. At this rate, some $74 million per year in sales tax would be

generated if Los Angeles has 900 dispensaries.


According

to NORML, other cities and counties that regulate dispensaries allow

them to sell to their members as nonprofit collectives as long as they

pay sales tax. NORML estimates that there are 100,000 to 200,000

medical Marijuana patients in the Los Angeles area, generating between

$400 million and $800 million annually in retail sales.


Under

the proposed ordinance, which has come under heavy criticism from the

medical Marijuana community, over-the-counter sales of pot would be

outlawed. The collectives would have to be at least 1,000 feet from

other collectives, schools, playgrounds, child care facilities,

religious institutions, public libraries, public parks, hospitals, and

rehab centers.


The normal committee hearing

process is being bypassed so that the L.A. city council can fast-track

the vote on the hastily written measure as soon as Nov. 3.


There are an estimated 800 to 1,000 Marijuana dispensaries in

L.A. County. A judge recently ruled the city's temporary

moratorium banning new dispensaries was invalid.


NORML

said the proposed ordinance would hamper the distribution of medical

Marijuana in Los Angeles by limiting collectives to a single, 100-plant

garden, meaning each dispensary could only serve a handful of members.

This would require tens of thousands of collectives and growing

operations throughout the city, the pro-pot organization said.

According to the group, nothing in state law authorizes such

limitations. Most collectives serve hundreds or thousands of members

and draw from many gardens.


NORML also objects

to a provision in the ordinance that would ban Marijuana extracts and

edibles, which enable many patients to ingest the herb without smoking

it. Oral preparations are especially important for patients who want to

avoid the possible respiratory hazards of smoking.


Patient

advocates are expected to sue if the restrictive proposed ordinance is

passed, on the grounds that it would limit patients' rights to

collectively cultivate and obtain medicine, as guaranteed under

Proposition 215 and Senate Bill 420.


Last week, a Mason-Dixon poll found that 77 percent of L.A. residents favor regulating Marijuana dispensaries rather than banning them. 

  • Pin It

Tags: ,

About The Author

Steve Elliott

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook

Slideshows

  • Pritkin Mansion 2014
    Browse through the eclectic Pritkin mansion. Photographs by Nathaniel Y. Downes.
  • Rock Scully Tribute 2014
    Moonalice and Fall Risk perform at Slims on December 20th for the Rock Scully tribute. Photographs by Jamie Soja.