Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

99¢ Only Stores Fined Enough to Afford 413,626 Items

Posted By on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:45 AM

click to enlarge Well, this'll cost a lot more...
  • Well, this'll cost a lot more...
Well, this'll cost a lot more...
The 99¢ Only chain has declined to appeal a federal judge's ruling -- meaning it now faces a fine of $409,490, or enough to afford 413,626 items at its stores.

The chain was on the losing end of an Environmental Protection Agency suit claiming it had sold hundreds of bottles of cleaning and pesticide products that were not regulated with the EPA, in violation of the law. The cleaners in question were Bref's Limpieza y Disinfección Total con Densicloro (Complete Cleaning and Disinfection with 'Densicloro', a Mexican-made product); Farmer's Secret Berry & Produce Cleaner," and "PiC BORIC ACID Roach Killer III."

The EPA claims the first two products were unregistered, and the roach killer was "misbranded," as its EPA labes were upside-down or inside out, and difficult to read. 

The ruling was originally handed down in June by Administrative Law Judge Susan L. Biro, and EPA officials say the appeal period expired today. SF Weekly's messages for 99¢ Only -- which offers callers "99 thanks" for dialing -- have not yet been returned.

click to enlarge Tenemos un problema aquí - EPA
  • EPA
  • Tenemos un problema aquí
EPA
Tenemos un problema aquí
Biro found the chain had violated Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act -- to the tune of 166 counts -- going back to cleaner and pesticide sales from early in the decade. While the EPA had pushed for a fine of nearly $960,000, Biro methodically reassessed the penalty via dozens of criteria -- culpability, toxicity, etc. -- over scores of pages. Biro found the EPA's desire of a nearly $1 million fine "unduly high" -- in large part because no proof has yet been offered that anyone was harmed by the unregulated products.

In the end, she settled on $409,490 -- far below the the max penalty of $6,500 per violation. Doing the math, the fine works out to $5,850 for the one count of selling the Farmer's Secret; $2,439 per violation for the 164 counts of peddling Bref; and $3,640 for the single count of selling PiC. The largest prior penalty assessed under FIFRA was around a quarter of a million dollars, incidentally.

Finally, you won't find any 99¢ Only stores -- or the aforementioned chemicals -- in San Francisco. But more than a dozen are within driving distance in the greater Bay Area.

Follow us on Twitter at @TheSnitchSF and @SFWeekly 




  • Pin It

Tags: , , , ,

About The Author

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi

Bio:
Joe Eskenazi was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left. "Your humble narrator" was a staff writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015. He resides in the Excelsior with his wife, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook

Slideshows

  • SF Pride Parade 2015
    A sea of spectators gathered along Market Street on Sunday, June 28 for the SF Pride Parade. Photographs by Calibree Photography.
  • Trans March 2015
    The San Francisco Trans March celebrated its 12th year, along with the Supreme Court's decision on same-sex marriage, which was voted in favor of gay marriages across the nation, on Friday, June 26, 2015. Photographs by Michael Ares.