Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Friday, August 12, 2011

BART Jams Cell Phone Service to Shut Down Protests

Posted By on Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:50 PM

click to enlarge No-speech zone?
  • No-speech zone?

This might just be a first in the annals of Bay Area transit agencies' political suppression (such as those annals are). BART has fessed up to jamming cell-phone signals yesterday at downtown stations in San Francisco in order to disrupt protests over the death of Charles Hill, who was shot by BART police on July 3.

Here is what BART had to say in a statement on its tactics that was released today:


Organizers planning to disrupt BART service on August 11, 2011 stated they would use mobile devices to coordinate their disruptive activities and communicate about the location and number of BART Police. A civil disturbance during commute times at busy downtown San Francisco stations could lead to platform overcrowding and unsafe conditions for BART customers, employees and demonstrators. BART temporarily interrupted service at select BART stations as one of many tactics to ensure the safety of everyone on the platform.

CNet reported that cell service was interrupted at four SF stations, and that BART acted unilaterally, only informing mobile-service providers after the fact.

Of course, BART's move drew immediate howls from advocates of free speech and civil liberties. Here is what the ACLU of Northern California had to say in a blog post:

All over the world people are using mobile devices to organize protests against repressive regimes, and we rightly criticize governments that respond by shutting down cell service, saying it's anti democratic and a violation of the right to free expression and assembly. Are we really willing to tolerate the same silencing of protest here in the United States?

SF Appeal is reporting that some experts are calling for the FCC to look into BART's actions.

Regardless of one's personal stance on government's power to impede free communication among its citizens -- and BART seems to have taken great liberties with that power, to say the least -- this reaction to protests seems boneheaded on a few levels.

For instance, isn't it a terrible idea to cut off law-abiding passengers' contact with the outside world at a time when potentially violent protests are taking place? What if somebody wanted to call 911, only to discover that he was unable to because of BART's effort to suppress demonstrators?

It's also a terrible PR move. In the aftermath of a controversial officer-involved fatal shooting, BART probably doesn't want to invite comparison with the likes of, say, Hosni Mubarak. But that is exactly what it has done.

Follow us on Twitter at @SFWeekly and @TheSnitchSF

  • Pin It

Tags: , , , ,

About The Author

Peter Jamison

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook

Slideshows